Skip to main content
Case Study

AI Competitive Intelligence for a 45-Person Agency

A performance marketing agency had scattered AI tools and no adoption strategy. We delivered a competitive assessment, prioritized roadmap, and phased implementation plan.

Digital Marketing
Mid-Market
AI Adoption Strategy
Process Automation
Key Metric
137 hrs/mo in savings identified
Industry
Performance Marketing
Company Size
45 employees
The Problem

Tool sprawl with no strategy

The agency had grown to 45 people across paid media, SEO, creative, and analytics teams. Individual team members had adopted a mix of AI tools — ChatGPT for copy drafts, Jasper for ad variations, various summarization tools for client reporting — but there was no coordination. Different teams were paying for overlapping tools, workflows weren't standardized, and leadership had no visibility into what was being used or whether it was producing results.

The CEO wanted to position the agency as AI-forward to clients, but couldn't articulate a coherent AI strategy because none existed. The bigger operational concern was reporting: analysts were spending significant hours each month on manual data aggregation, formatting, and narrative writing for client reports — work that was clearly automatable but hadn't been systematically addressed.

They needed someone to assess the current state, benchmark against competitors, and build a realistic adoption plan they could execute without hiring a dedicated AI team.

Our Approach

Competitive audit, then operational roadmap

Spej started with a competitive intelligence assessment — analyzing how other agencies in their segment were adopting AI, what tools and workflows were becoming standard, and where the client was falling behind or ahead. This gave leadership a factual benchmark rather than guesswork about market positioning.

Simultaneously, we mapped every department's workflows and AI tool usage. We categorized each use case by time savings potential, quality impact, and implementation complexity. The reporting workflow stood out immediately: analysts were spending an estimated 137 hours per month across the team on tasks that could be substantially automated with the right pipeline.

We built a phased implementation plan that the agency could execute with existing staff. Phase one focused on reporting automation and tool consolidation. Phase two addressed creative workflow optimization. Phase three covered client-facing AI capabilities the agency could offer as a service line.

Deliverables

What we delivered

  • Competitive intelligence report benchmarking AI adoption across 12 comparable agencies
  • Comprehensive AI tool audit across all departments with overlap and gap analysis
  • Workflow mapping for reporting, creative production, media buying, and client communications
  • Prioritized AI adoption roadmap with three implementation phases
  • Reporting automation design identifying 137 hours per month in savings opportunities
  • Tool consolidation plan reducing redundant subscriptions and standardizing usage
  • AI service line proposal for client-facing AI capabilities
Results

Measurable outcomes

137 hrs/mo
in reporting savings identified
3 phases
of implementation planned and prioritized
12
competitor AI strategies benchmarked
Capabilities Used
AI Strategy & Governance
Business Process Engineering
AI Training & Enablement

Stop experimenting. Start executing.

A 30-minute discovery call to assess where you are, where the gaps are, and what a structured path forward looks like.

Book a Discovery Call

No pitch deck. No pressure. Just clarity.